americanfreepress.org� in association with the Liberty Project� presents |
associalisticpress.com� 10 Sept 2004 |
HOME PAGE | The ap archives | Contact the ap | ap Retractions | tha malcontent |
ap / associalisticpress.com� Vs. �
By
RON FOURNIER
(Direct descendent of
Joseph Stalin! - tha malcontent)
(ap) - The first reference to Actual Poll numbers
comes 5 paragraphs into this story, but it is not before this: "Among all
registered voters, Bush-Cheney led the Democratic ticket 51 percent to 43
percent, a modest bounce in support since early August, when Kerry-Edwards led
48-45 percent."... "Modest bounce"?... John-John, J. Forbes-Heinz-Kerry-Edwards
(D) received NO bounce from their Convention, and were ahead going in! It
went from 48-45 to 51-43... That's 8 points that Bush/Cheney is leading
by, and a drop of Kerry by 5, and gain of Bush (43) by 6! Immediately
following the DemocRATS Convention, Kerry began trailing, after NO Bounce, yet
the AP refuses to do Comparative Analysis on that. Among Likely Voters,
the AP finds a 5 point lead for Bush (43). Other polls find between 2-3,
to 7-12 for Bush (43). It should be mandatory for Institutions that Poll,
to at least show averages among all Polls... Anyway. - tha malcontent)
(The Vast Majority of people read
Headlines, and from the tone of this Paragraph, it was an Abnormally Objective
view of the AP's own Poll on the part of the AP to print the previous paragraph,
and you would not have come to this Conclusion about the Poll results based on
the previous paragraph. "Modest" is not what the previous paragraph
sounded like to me... "Previously", anyway! - tha malcontent)
(Again, "Modest" is not what this
paragraph sounded like to me either. - tha malcontent)
(This is not your Average AP
story... But again, Dan Rather (D) can make this statement on the Nightly: "The
Associated Press found in it's Polling that Bush only made ONLY "Modest" gains
regarding his "Bounce" from the Convention"... Are you starting to understand
how the game is played? - tha malcontent)
(If the "Free Press" propped Nader
up as they did Perot in 1992, Nader would be taking at least 10% from the
DemocRATS. Instead, you only hear about Nader midway through stories
such as this one that the Average American will never read. By the way,
Perot took 19% of the Popular Vote in 1992, while Clinton was ushered into
Office by the Base of the DemocRAT Party with a measly 43%!... Thanks again,
Ross! - tha malcontent)
("As would be expected"... Read
that paragraph again, and tell me what's wrong with that piece of Editorial Dung
that the AP is attempting to pass off! - tha malcontent)
("Whose nominating convention was
heavily focused on his Vietnam War record"... This was Kerry's First, and Final
mistake, and the AP knows it, they are simply not ready to throw in the towel as
of this date. After all, "Bush (43) could still step on his own %&#!, ya
know!" - tha malcontent)
(Modest: "Moderate or limited in
size, quantity"... Yeah, an entire turnaround of the Campaigns, and an average
of about a 7 to 8 point gain, from all Polls taken coming out of the
Conventions, is "Modest" when the Incumbent is leading! Call up Carter/Mondale/Dukkakis
and ask them about the "Modest" gains that Reagan and Bush (41) made back in
1980/84/88... By the way, Clinton, in 1992 had 57% of Americans Vote AGAINST him
in the DemocRATS "Popular Vote"... Don't ever forget that! - tha malcontent)
("GOP-inspired criticism of Kerry's
war record"?... Notice the lack of ANY Evidence to support this Baseless
Claim?... There has been NO Direct Connection made to the RNC, Bush (43), or
Cheney, NOR have any of the previously Referenced entities said anything but
Positive statements about Kerry's Service... If I am wrong, e-mail it to me and
Prove me wrong. I will post it at the Top of the Fold! By Contrast,
Kerry HIMSELF, has been all but calling Bush (43) "AWOL" since earlier this
year... Well before the Swiftvets were even heard of! - tha malcontent)
(Impressive... This is 2 in a row.
The AP may be coming around to the understanding of what Objectivity means.
They seem to balance multiple paragraphs of their own Editorials, masquerading
as Wire Copy with at least one quote of a Real Person explaining why Kerry will
not be the next President of the United States. - tha malcontent)
(Read this story from start to this
point as many times as it takes to Realize that at no point did the AP make the
Case that Kerry received "Gains" from his Convention, which is what this story
is based on... Bush (43)'s gains from his Convention. The Bias is stilled
Veiled at times! - tha malcontent)
(Notice how "presidential debates"
is only in quotes when I typed it just now?... That's because it's an example of
more Editorializing on the Main Wire without the benefit of Declaration of the
part of the AP! If you would just be Honest about your Bias, we would stop
Bitching. - tha malcontent)
(And if the DemocRATS can count on
the likes of the AP, who in 2000 called Florida an hour before the Conservative
panhandle of the State had finished Voting, this coming only a couple of days
after Forwarding a 24 year-old DUI story that seemed to be Left on the shelves
of the "Free Press" until needed, was dropped... Yeah, we will see if the
post-Dan Rather (D) Forged Document, 4th Interview with a Bush-Basher/Kerry
Campaign Vice Chairman on 60 Minutes in a row story doesn't Seal the Coffin for
Kerry first! Hey, at least Barnes' new book isn't a CBS/Viacom project, as
other Dan Rather (D) "guests" on 60 Minutes who Bash Bush (43) have been! - tha
malcontent)
(First and foremost, Kerry did NOT
get a Bounce... That's been established by ALL of the "Free Press", which means
he probably lost points in Reality. Second, the "double-digit" lead was a
product of TIME and Newsweak attempting to make the slide seem larger than it
really would be... Been there, done that! - tha malcontent)
(And if an Incumbent is in the lead
on job performance to the tune of 50%+ in March of said Election year, they have
ALWAYS won... Just in case you did not know that. - tha malcontent)
(And Clinton almost got a 50%
Plurality in 1996, compared with 57% of Americans Rejecting him at the Polls in
1992!... Only 49% of Voters EVER Honestly Supported him during his ENTIRE
Presidency. - tha malcontent)
(The number of jobs lost according
to the AP and others just a year or so ago, was 2 1/2 MILLION... Now it's
"nearly a million". FACT: The 3 months following 9/11, America lost 1
million jobs. Does anyone care to blame that on Bush (43)'s Economic
Policies?... Speaking of his Economic Policies, his first Budget did not
go into affect until the end of October of 2001, "nearly" 2 months after the
11th. During Clinton's Final Budget, following a year-long Economic
Decline in 2000, America went from a 3.9% Unemployment Rate, to 5.6%... During
Clinton's Final Budget! This is FACT as History states it. Currently
we are enjoying a 5.4% Unemployment Rate, which is better than the one Clinton
was Re-elected with... Just in case your "Free Press" was not letting you in on
the FACTS. - tha malcontent)
(I noticed that the Swiftvets were
Focused on Bush (43)'s handling of the Economy and the War on Terror... I can
see how the DemocRATS claims of the Swift Boat Veterans who Served WITH Kerry
are helping Bush (43) with those issues.. Why, just the other day, I saw a
Swiftie Ad that was all about the Economy and how Bush (43) was handling the
War. - tha malcontent)
(Wow... I am Shocked that the AP is
admitting the "gut-level choice" numbers... Clearing thy Conscience, are we? -
tha malcontent)
(In a post-9/11 Age, there is a 14
point swing towards the Incumbent regarding "who can be trusted to protect the
country"?... Is there an Honest Liberal out there who can deny Reality at this
point? - tha malcontent)
("9-Point Swing on Honesty for Bush
(42) would have made a nice headline, wouldn't it! - tha malcontent)
|
Don't do what you're polled to do!� |
This web site is designed, maintained and edited by tha malcontent...
"what have you done for Liberty today?"
associalisticpress.com� is protected speech pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and is faithfully enforced by tha malcontent via the Second Amendment to that same Constitution. Any reproduction or redistribution of this article will be seen as an awakening of a Patriot in this Great Republic by tha malcontent, and subsequently applauded! (copyrightwing 2000-2004)
associalisticpress.com�
an americanfreepress� organization 2000-2004
The ap� & The afp�
- the Liberty Project� -
|
HOME PAGE | The ap archives | Contact the ap | ap Retractions | tha malcontent |