americanfreepress.org�  in association with the Liberty Project� presents

Back to the ap   |   The ap archives   |   Contact the ap   |   ap Retractions   |   tha malcontent

 

ap / associalisticpress.com�    Vs.    �


 Scalia Ridicules Court's Gay Sex Ruling

By ? (Direct descendent of Joseph Stalin! - tha malcontent)
 Associated Press Writer Oct 26, 2:54 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) � Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ridiculed his court's recent ruling legalizing gay sex, telling an audience of conservative activists Thursday that the ruling ignores the Constitution in favor of a modern, liberal sensibility. The ruling, Scalia said, "held to be a constitutional right what had been a criminal offense at the time of the founding and for nearly 200 years thereafter."

 

(ap) - "Modern Liberal sensibility"... If only the Left could get us to understand how right they are, and how wrong we are!  Ah, but the Left will say that Slavery was legal also, and we finally grew to understand how wrong that was... And it was.  What the Left fails to understand, is that what people (C)hoose to do, and what is Natural to our species, are not the same, and should not find sanction under Law equally, because it is the "popular" thing to do Socially at any given time in our History.  Incest and Bigamy are next on the Agenda, this you can be sure of.  Not much further behind it, is the "age of consent" issue.  If a female is reproductive at 9 or 10 years of age, as some are, is it not Natural that her body is capable to reproduce?  It's not a choice she made, like Homosexuality is.  If we keep her from reproducing by Law until she is 14 in some states, 16 in others and 18 in others, are we not arbitrarily setting a standard of who is capable of consent with their own bodies?  Just wait until the Left realizes the voter base they can pad with this constituency base!  They will be clamoring to lower the voting age to 16, or even 14... Maybe even lower!  If you think what I am saying is absurd, just go ask a 70 or 80 year old about how absurd "Gay Rights" would have sounded to them 30 or 40 years ago.  I am only an observer, so if what I have said has upset you, then maybe it is in need of more consideration.  The Pedophiles are waiting for their opportunity, and they have tenured Liberal professors backing them up.  When it happens, will those of you who have denied it over the years, at least be Honest enough to give me credit for predicting the decline before it came? - tha malcontent)

Scalia adopted a mocking tone to read from the court's June ruling that struck down state antisodomy laws in Texas and elsewhere.

Scalia wrote a bitter dissent in the gay sex case that was longer than the ruling itself.

 

(So Scalia is "mocking" and "bitter", AP?  Is this a commentary, or a Wire story?  Please, stop dry-humping the "Free Press" clause of the First Amendment, and stick to reporting the news, as opposed to trying to make the news, or skew it in your favor while attacking your political enemies! - tha malcontent)

On Thursday, Scalia said judges, including his colleagues on the Supreme Court, throw over the original meaning of the Constitution when it suits them.

"Most of today's experts on the Constitution think the document written in Philadelphia in 1787 was simply an early attempt at the construction of what is called a liberal political order," Scalia told a gathering of the Intercollegiate Studies Institute.

"All that the person interpreting or applying that document has to do is to read up on the latest academic understanding of liberal political theory and interpolate these constitutional understandings into the constitutional text."

 

(This is why the "great object" of Thomas Jefferson's "Fear", was the Federal Judiciary.  How ironic was it that it was his personal letter to the Danbury Baptists that an Activist Supreme Court used to modify the First Amendment of the Constitution, outside of the Constitutional process that is required, when they used his words, "Separation of Church and State".  Jefferson did not sign the Constitution, by the way, but that Leftist Court had no trouble modifying Law based on one of his personal letters.  This same type of Dishonest Judicial Activism brought us Dred/Scott, and had that Court APPLIED the Constitution, Slavery would have ended much earlier than it did.  Instead, they, not unlike many Courts to follow, interpreted, based on current politics, what the Constitution really meant.  This is dangerous, and it is precisely why Jefferson "feared" it!  - tha malcontent)

Scalia is a hero of conservatives who favor a strict adherence to the actual text of the Constitution.

 

(Damned that "actual text of the Constitution"!  Do these people really listen to themselves, or are they so diluted that they really believe the TRIPE they print and attempt to call "news"? - tha malcontent)

The 50-year-old Intercollegiate Studies Institute is a private conservative education organization that sponsors lectures and conferences and scholarships. The group says its mission is to, "enhance the rising generation's knowledge of our nation's founding principles limited government, individual liberty, personal responsibility, free enterprise and Judeo-Christian moral standards."

ISI draws much of its funding from conservative foundations, including three controlled by or associated with billionaire philanthropist Richard Mellon Scaife, a vehement critic of former President Clinton.

 

(Hey AP, the next time you reference NOW in one of your DNC Talking Points, masquerading as legitimate Wire copy, could you at least be Honest enough to do a biography on them too, noting where their money comes from, and what Leftist organizations they are linked to? - tha malcontent)

Scalia spoke after standing with some 800 others to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

The Supreme Court announced last week that it will hear a case testing the constitutionality of the current version of the pledge as it is recited in public schools and that Scalia will not take part.

Scalia apparently sidelined himself because of remarks he made earlier this year critical of a lower court ruling in the case. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had found the pledge was unconstitutional in public school classroom because of the phrase, "one nation, under God."

 

(The most LIBERAL and most overturned Circuit Court in the nation, if the AP was as Honest about the 9th's background, as they are the ISI... But they are not Honest, as we have proven via their own words over the years! - tha malcontent)

The Supreme Court could decide to strip the words "under God" from the patriotic oath or rule that the mention of God does not violate the notion of separation of church and state.

 

(How about the opening Prayer that the Court has said since it's inception, AP?... Is that worse than "under God"?  The Hypocrisy of the Court will grow even more if they rule that "under God" is unConstitutional!  I am looking forward to their ruling, as I do with every ruling that comes out of the "great object" of Thomas Jefferson's "Fear"! - tha malcontent)
 


 � Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


(That depends on what the meaning of "may" is... All commentary included on this website is the opinion of tha malcontent and is based in the Truth.  No Liberals, Marxists, Stalinists, Socialists, Communists or DemocRATS were harmed in the making of this website, I promise! -  tha malcontent)

 

Don't do what you're polled to do!� 

 

This web site is designed, maintained and edited by tha malcontent...

 

 "what have you done for Liberty today?"

 

associalisticpress.com� is protected speech pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and is faithfully enforced by tha malcontent via the Second Amendment to that same Constitution. Any reproduction or redistribution of this article will be seen as an awakening of a Patriot in this Great Republic by tha malcontent, and subsequently applauded! (copyrightwing 2000-2003)

 

associalisticpress.com�

 

an americanfreepress� organization 2000-2003

 

The ap�  & The afp�

 

- the Liberty Project� -

 

'Si vis pacem Para Bellum'

 

Back to the ap  |   The ap archives   |   Contact the ap  |   ap Retractions  |   tha malcontent