americanfreepress.org� in association with the Liberty Project� presents |
associalisticpress.com� 1 Dec 2003 |
Back to the ap | The ap archives | Contact the ap | ap Retractions | tha malcontent |
ap / associalisticpress.com� Vs. �
(ap) - The Associated Press, along
with all of it's loyal children in the "Free Press", who feed at it's teat on a
regular basis, are only focusing on "the beating" aspect of this video, as
opposed to the entire video, and what transpired, as they did with Rodney King.
"Fatal Beating of Man in Custody Probed", is a headline that so defies Honesty
on the part of the AP, considering the Factual evidence we all have seen, that I
am really surprised that they would post this headline, even with their Left of
Center track record in the past on these types of issues. Let's break it
down... According to the video, and I have seen it multiple times, a very large,
and aggressive Black man is approaching an officer in a parking lot who has his
hands up, no weapon in hand, at the man, as the man taunts him with "white boy"
and "red neck", and then attacks the officer. This happens within 2
minutes of the officers arriving on seen. The attacked officer and the
another officer then wrestle with the man, taking multiple shots at him with
their night sticks. The AP assumes in their headline, that this Black
man's cause of death was the beating. They also make the patently
FALSE claim that this man was "in Custody". Anyone who has seen this
video, knows, that this man was the furthest thing from "in Custody", as this
"beating" took place. The more accurate, and Honest headline would have
been, "Man Dies after Police Beating that was Sparked by Attack on Police".
The Left cares not "who started it", in these instances, or in debate,
especially if it makes "their side" look the guilty party, if "who started" it
is established. The same can be said for their tactics in the political
realm. The 9 Jackasses a Braying have been attacking the President for
months and months now, and any time that the President or his people "defend"
themselves, the media equates their non-attacking defense, with the original
DemocRAT attack, and then forgets about the DemocRATS attack, instead, focusing
on how "politicized" the President has become. Who starts what, DOES
matter. In this newest installment of "Nothing but a G-thang AP", the AP
has shown once again, that who starts it, is as meaningless to them as the Truth
and the Facts are in their reporting. It's good to come back from Vacation
and have a gem like this served up by the AP for me! - tha malcontent)
(Well Mayor, the AP only sees a the
"deadly beating of a Black man". The only thing missing from this coverage
by the AP, is "White Officers", over and over and over again. - tha malcontent)
(It was not his grotesque obesity,
his drug use, or his enlarged heart that killed him. It was not even his
initial attack on the Police. No, it was "the beating", wasn't AP? - tha
malcontent)
(Was the "unarmed Black man" who
was shot by the "White officer", doing ANYTHING wrong AP? Did an Officer
of the Law, just randomly gun down and entirely innocent, Law abiding
citizen?... Of course not! The question is, why is the AP neglecting to
expand on their analogy? The answer is, because the conclusion negates
their Agenda. The original, racially drive hype, is what they want
continued, from story to story. - tha malcontent)
(It will take as many as is
necessary, Nate! How many of your people are going to die before respect
for Law and order, and respect for one's self, and one's responsibilities are
going to be what you are calling for from "your people"? - tha malcontent)
(At what point in time is the AP
going to focus on the "white boy" and "red neck" verbal attacks by this Black
man, that were followed by his initial attack on the officer? Who starts
what, matters. - tha malcontent)
(The AP is pissed that the Black
officer was on the scene. It keeps them from saying "4 White Officers",
over and over and over and over again. Maybe they can get him to turn on
his Brothers in Blue. - tha malcontent)
(Well Mayor, what Honest people saw
was exactly the same thing... The AP is not staffed with Honest people though.
Otherwise, they would not be festering this situation, in the hopes of covering
it further. - tha malcontent)
(Who cares what Je$$e has to
say? How about asking Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson what he thinks for once,
AP? - tha malcontent)
(SIT DOWN, and SHUT UP! - tha
malcontent)
(Again, who starts what, matters. -
tha malcontent)
(AP, did you not hear the audio, in
which this Black man racially taunted the Officer as he approached, and then
attacked? - tha malcontent)
(That's because he is nearly 400
pounds, a drug user, and in a physical altercation, that he himself instigated,
with other men. He's dead because of Choices that he made, end of list. -
tha malcontent)
(The (N)ational (A)ssociation (A)gainst
(C)aucasian (P)eople, is nothing more than a tool for Black Racists. They
are a polite, Black KKK. - tha malcontent)
(Again, who starts what, matters.
Had this man not instigated this situation by taunting, and physically attacking
the police, he would still be alive today. - tha malcontent)
(Well... I guest this man was NOT
"innocent", was he AP. It would have helped to have included this
information earlier, when you were attempting to draw an analogy from this
current Notorious BIG situation, to that earlier, unfortunate police shooting.
I wonder why the AP Left this Factual information out until the end of this
story, that almost no one has finished? - tha malcontent)
(Is that Citizen Review Panel,
mostly Black? Why is the conclusion of this killing being "Just", not the
focus, as the killing was? The AP does this kind of thing, along with it's
minions in the "Free Press", for a number of reasons... The first, is White
Liberal Guilt. The second, is to help forward the Left's political Agenda,
in the hopes of gaining more Power next November, and every other November.
Us against them. White against Black. Liberal against Conservative.
Just because they are not Honest enough to say it directly, this is exactly what
the Left in the "Free Press" is saying almost daily. - tha malcontent)
|
Don't do what you're polled to do!� |
This web site is designed, maintained and edited by tha malcontent...
"what have you done for Liberty today?"
associalisticpress.com� is protected speech pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and is faithfully enforced by tha malcontent via the Second Amendment to that same Constitution. Any reproduction or redistribution of this article will be seen as an awakening of a Patriot in this Great Republic by tha malcontent, and subsequently applauded! (copyrightwing 2000-2003)
associalisticpress.com�
an americanfreepress� organization 2000-2003
The ap� & The afp�
- the Liberty Project� -
|
Back to the ap | The ap archives | Contact the ap | ap Retractions | tha malcontent |