a
malcontent rant�
08.20.2004
You'd think Kerry spent 20 years in Vietnam...
By
tha malcontent
(Direct
Descendent of the Founding Fathers! - tha malcontent)
ap/afp
Editor
in Chief August 20,
11:25
ET
(ap) - You'd think Kerry spent 20
years in Vietnam... In Fact, he only Served 4 months of a 12 month Tour, a Tour
he Volunteered for when Swift Boats were non-Combat.
But judging from his Convention, you would think he spent 4 months in the
Senate, close to the Career John-John Edwards has had in Politics, when in Fact,
he has a 20 year Record in the Senate, and was Lt. Governor to Michael Dukkakis.
It's Curious how Kerry avoids his Political Service to this Country, isn't it?
John Kerry is the Reason we are Focused on Vietnam again.
In 1992 Kerry Defended Clinton's protesting of America on Foreign Soil during
Vietnam by claiming that Military Service, or lack thereof, was not an issue
that should be part of a Presidential Debate.
John Kerry organized a Convention that's centerpiece was 4 months of his Life in
Vietnam.
John Kerry spent more time attacking Vietnam Vets than he did collecting 3
Purple Hearts in 4 months in Vietnam, none of which caused him to stay overnight
for Hospitalization, and one he personally Petitioned for after his Doctor and
Commander denied him.
John Kerry put a Dishonest Attack Dog, Michael Moore, in the Presidential Booth
next to Jimmy Carter at his Convention.
John Kerry indirectly Attacked the President at his Convention by claiming he
was "Reporting for Duty".
Anyone who denies that this was a jab at the unProven allegations that Bush (43)
did not "Report for Duty" in the Guard, is being Intellectually Dishonest.
Now John Kerry wants Vietnam Veterans who Served with him to stop questioning
him on his main Campaign Theme.
The Men who Served with him have something to say.
Deal with the Substance of it John.
Bush (43) is not going to get in the middle of this fight that Kerry is having
with his Fellow Officers from Vietnam, and he is not going to Condemn them.
They Served, and they have Right to answer Kerry's Convention's call.
Kerry, in regard to these Veterans, challenged Bush (43) to, "Bring it on"...
Bush (43) is not questioning Kerry's Service, and is on the Record saying as
much.
Kerry's Fellow Officers are.
If Kerry wants a Debate on his Service, as he is currently Challenging, then
there are plenty of Officers who Served with him who are willing to accept his
Challenge.
Is he willing?...
We know the answer to that one!
He made a very big mistake opening this wound even wider this week.
He only has himself to blame for the current Debate on Vietnam and his Service,
and his Attacks of the Veterans when he returned, and the Lies that are
currently being exposed about those Attacks by the very Soldiers and Officers
who Served and Bunked with him for those 4 short months of his Life.
Maybe sometime soon, before the Election, we can focus on his Record as a
Senator.
The Bush (43) Camp is already doing it, and that does not look good for Kerry
either.
Maybe Vietnam is the lesser of two Evils for him compared with his Political
Career.
We shall see.
peace,
tha malcontent
(All commentary included on this website is the opinion of tha malcontent and is
based in the Truth. No Liberals, Marxists, Stalinists, Socialists,
Communists or DemocRATS were harmed in the making of this website, I promise!
- tha malcontent)
|
This web
site is designed, maintained and edited by tha
malcontent...
"what
have you done for Liberty today?"
associalisticpress.com�
is protected speech pursuant to the First Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States and is faithfully enforced by tha
malcontent via the Second Amendment to that same
Constitution. Any reproduction or redistribution of this article will be seen as
an awakening of a Patriot in this Great Republic by tha
malcontent, and subsequently applauded! (copyrightwing
2000-2004)
associalisticpress.com�
an
americanfreepress�
organization 2000-2004
The
ap� &
The afp�
-
the
Liberty Project�
-
'Si
vis pacem Para
Bellum'
|