NYT: He did it because he was Harassed about
Editor in Chief
4:55 AM MST
(ap) - In Predictable Fashion, the
"Free Press", led by the New York Times is going down this road:
Hasan was ‘mortified’ about deployment
Relatives: Ft. Hood suspect upset over being harassed
about being Muslim
By JAMES DAO
updated 8:43 p.m. MT, Thurs., Nov . 5, 2009
WASHINGTON - Born and reared in Virginia, the son of immigrant parents from a
small Palestinian town near Jerusalem, he joined the Army right out of high
school, against his parents’ wishes. The Army, in turn, put him through college
and then medical school, where he trained to be a psychiatrist.
But Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the 39-year-old man accused of Thursday’s mass
shooting at Fort Hood, Tex., started having second thoughts about his military
career a few years ago after other soldiers harassed him for being a Muslim, he
told relatives in Virginia.
I could set my Watch to this ***.
For those of you who say this has nothing to do with Islam, well, either way it
The New York Times is now Excusing this Animal, Above the Fold, for what he did
And YES, this is the NYT Excusing it.
One can only Conclude that if our Mean Cracker Servicemen weren't Harassing him
about his Religion, that he wouldn't have had to Shoot them all up.
That and if he didn't have to be Deployed to Boooooshes Failed Wars Against his
There is NO Excuse for this, NYT, and your Running with Family Hearsay within
the First 24 Hours of this Massacre is Shameless to say the Least.
Here's an Example of the NYT Qualifying Hearsay that goes the Direction they
don't want to:
In one posting on the Web site Scribd, a man named Nidal Hasan compared the
heroism of a soldier who throws himself on a grenade to protect fellow soldiers
to suicide bombers who sacrifice themselves to protect Muslims.
“If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught
off guard that would be considered a strategic victory,” the man wrote. It could
not be confirmed, however, that the writer was Major Hasan.
^If it is him, can we say that he was the Enemy in this War, and not some
Soldier who Snapped?...
The NYT Certainly didn't have a Problem Inking Family Hearsay as Fact when
Assisted in Excusing this Puke, did they.
It could not be confirmed, however
People have Short Memories... I Remember the Beltway Sniper... I Remember the
"Free Press" almost Immediately Assuming it had to be some Angry Cracker,
probably a Hunter, who was doing it.
Ends up being a Couple, and a MEAN Couple of Islam Converts, and Suddenly the
Stereotyping of Groups Stops with the "Free Press".
Time will Tell... But the Selective Assumptions and Excuse Making by the New
York Times within the First 24 Hours is Disturbing to say the Least...
Predictable, but Disturbing all the same.
How many of these Events that are Perpetrated by Islamists on American Soil are
we going to Excuse before we Realize that this War was Begun on our Soil in
February of 1993 and it Continues to this Day... Not just over there...
~ Have an Opinion?... Then e-mail me @
Contact the ap and Sound off
like ya got a Pair!
included on this website is the opinion of tha malcontent and is based in the
Truth. No Liberals, Marxists, Stalinists, Socialists, Communists or
DemocRATS were harmed in the making of this website, I promise! -
This web site is designed,
maintained and edited by tha malcontent...
"what have you done for Liberty
is protected speech pursuant to the First Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States and is faithfully enforced by
via the Second Amendment to that same Constitution. Any reproduction or
redistribution of this article will be seen as an awakening of a Patriot in this
Great Republic by
and subsequently applauded!
- All rights reserved.
tha malcontent... The Original
Gangster of the Pajamahidin